PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOGY.TO achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than YAMZ.NEO's 3.60% return.


GOGY.TO

1D
-0.88%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
14.33%
6M
10.62%
1Y
123.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YAMZ.NEO

1D
-3.59%
1M
-9.20%
YTD
3.60%
6M
6.36%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
28.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOGY.TO and YAMZ.NEO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOGY.TO
GOGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GOGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

YAMZ.NEO
YAMZ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOGY.TOYAMZ.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.08

0.66

+3.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.07

1.09

+3.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.14

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.19

0.98

+5.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.77

2.44

+20.33

GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOGY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.08, which is higher than the YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOGY.TO and YAMZ.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOGY.TOYAMZ.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08

0.66

+3.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.31

1.20

+1.12

Drawdowns

GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, smaller than the maximum YAMZ.NEO drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOGY.TO and YAMZ.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOGY.TOYAMZ.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.87%

-34.37%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.14%

-21.79%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.57%

-10.34%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-7.20%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.47%

8.73%

-3.26%

Volatility

GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) have volatilities of 9.16% and 9.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOGY.TOYAMZ.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

9.40%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.42%

22.63%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.67%

32.41%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.61%

34.24%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.61%

34.24%

+0.37%

GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOGY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than YAMZ.NEO's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOGY.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Dividend Comparison

GOGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, less than YAMZ.NEO's 14.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GOGY.TO
Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units
12.78%8.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
14.93%14.12%8.07%7.89%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOGY.TO and YAMZ.NEO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GOGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.72% for YAMZ.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GOGY.TO and 1.72% for YAMZ.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOGY.TO and YAMZ.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer