PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOGIX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOGIX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund (GOGIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOGIX achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 11.78% return.


GOGIX

1D
0.31%
1M
-2.66%
6M
2.75%
YTD
9.56%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
9.58%
ALL TIME*
6.94%

FHLFX

1D
-0.71%
1M
1.26%
6M
5.76%
YTD
11.78%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GOGIX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GOGIX
John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund
9.56%29.79%10.70%12.93%-26.80%9.67%22.44%27.85%-15.27%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
11.78%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GOGIX and FHLFX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.89

The correlation between GOGIX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOGIX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOGIX
GOGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GOGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GOGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOGIX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund (GOGIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOGIXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.30

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.23

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.16

8.46

-3.31

GOGIX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOGIX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOGIX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOGIX drawdown since its inception was -54.30%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOGIX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOGIXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.30%

-33.58%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-11.37%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.70%

-13.62%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.22%

-29.36%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.65%

-0.71%

-5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.11%

-6.01%

-6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

3.00%

+0.82%

Volatility

GOGIX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund (GOGIX) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.47%. This indicates that GOGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOGIXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

4.47%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.60%

13.25%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.55%

15.52%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

16.11%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

17.62%

-0.41%

GOGIX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOGIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOGIX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

GOGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than FHLFX's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.10%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOGIX
John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund
0.08%0.08%0.78%2.66%13.68%15.35%0.21%0.67%2.90%0.49%0.94%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOGIX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOGIX has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to FHLFX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOGIX dropped -54.30% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOGIX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer