GOGFX vs. MCSFX
GOGFX (Victory Sycamore Small Company Opportunity Fund) and MCSFX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - GOGFX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Victory, while MCSFX is a Commodities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, GOGFX returned 7.39%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for MCSFX. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GOGFX charges 1.42%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for MCSFX.
Performance
GOGFX vs. MCSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOGFX achieves a 20.50% return, which is significantly higher than MCSFX's 17.78% return.
GOGFX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 20.50%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
MCSFX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- YTD
- 17.78%
- 1Y
- 31.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GOGFX vs. MCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOGFX Victory Sycamore Small Company Opportunity Fund | 20.50% | 1.16% | 4.87% | 11.10% | -7.11% | 24.78% | 4.21% | 13.52% |
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 17.78% | 17.09% | 4.32% | -7.25% | 12.27% | 26.40% | -1.34% | -1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOGFX and MCSFX is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019 | 0.21 |
The correlation between GOGFX and MCSFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOGFX vs. MCSFX — Risk / Return Rank
GOGFX
MCSFX
GOGFX vs. MCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Sycamore Small Company Opportunity Fund (GOGFX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOGFX | MCSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.46 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 7.59 | +1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOGFX vs. MCSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.84%, which is greater than MCSFX's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOGFX and MCSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOGFX | MCSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.84% | -37.16% | -18.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -12.77% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.25% | -12.77% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.25% | -37.16% | +10.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -8.23% | +8.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -18.05% | +10.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 4.13% | -0.92% |
Volatility
GOGFX vs. MCSFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory Sycamore Small Company Opportunity Fund (GOGFX) is 3.90%, while MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that GOGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOGFX | MCSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 4.39% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 12.01% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 16.19% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 34.12% | -12.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 29.31% | -6.97% |
GOGFX vs. MCSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOGFX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSFX's 1.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOGFX vs. MCSFX - Dividend Comparison
GOGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, less than MCSFX's 12.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOGFX Victory Sycamore Small Company Opportunity Fund | 4.97% | 5.99% | 9.29% | 6.87% | 6.10% | 13.49% | 0.60% | 5.30% | 14.65% | 5.37% | 4.66% | 9.99% |
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 12.77% | 15.05% | 2.25% | 1.04% | 26.24% | 54.80% | 0.15% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOGFX and MCSFX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCSFX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to GOGFX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOGFX dropped -55.84% vs MCSFX's -37.16%.
MCSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOGFX and MCSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer