PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GOGB.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GOGB.L is traded in GBP, while WQDV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WQDV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOGB.L achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than WQDV.L's 14.68% return.


GOGB.L

1D
0.44%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*

WQDV.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.71%
YTD
14.68%
6M
14.87%
1Y
32.10%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GOGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF
-0.27%16.93%11.23%4.82%-0.76%16.28%7.72%
WQDV.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
14.68%15.30%11.80%11.28%4.16%17.05%6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between GOGB.L and WQDV.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020

0.74

The correlation between GOGB.L and WQDV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GOGB.L
WQDV.L

Industrials

25.9%
11.1%

Technology

18.3%
35.2%

Consumer Defensive

16.8%
3.6%

Healthcare

15.2%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
4.3%

Financial Services

6.8%
16.9%

Communication Services

6.5%
5.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.7%

Energy

-

4.1%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

3.1%

Industrials

GOGB.L
25.9%
WQDV.L
11.1%

Technology

GOGB.L
18.3%
WQDV.L
35.2%

Consumer Defensive

GOGB.L
16.8%
WQDV.L
3.6%

Healthcare

GOGB.L
15.2%
WQDV.L
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GOGB.L
9.4%
WQDV.L
4.3%

Financial Services

GOGB.L
6.8%
WQDV.L
16.9%

Communication Services

GOGB.L
6.5%
WQDV.L
5.4%

Basic Materials

GOGB.L
1.1%
WQDV.L
0.7%

Energy

GOGB.L

-

WQDV.L
4.1%

Real Estate

GOGB.L

-

WQDV.L
1.3%

Utilities

GOGB.L

-

WQDV.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOGB.L
GOGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GOGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GOGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

WQDV.L
WQDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
WQDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GOGB.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOGB.LWQDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.53

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

4.80

-3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

17.85

-14.93

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the WQDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOGB.L and WQDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOGB.LWQDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

2.84

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

1.02

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.68

+0.04

Drawdowns

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOGB.L drawdown since its inception was -13.86%, smaller than the maximum WQDV.L drawdown of -24.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOGB.L and WQDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOGB.LWQDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-24.60%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-6.65%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.86%

-14.86%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.86%

-14.86%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.25%

-0.03%

-5.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-3.00%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

1.79%

+1.59%

Volatility

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GOGB.L) is 3.27%, while iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that GOGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WQDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOGB.LWQDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.64%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

8.81%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

11.24%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.66%

12.58%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.97%

14.11%

-1.14%

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOGB.L has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than WQDV.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOGB.L vs. WQDV.L - Dividend Comparison

GOGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WQDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WQDV.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.16%2.31%2.58%2.78%2.95%2.75%2.81%3.01%3.28%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOGB.L and WQDV.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WQDV.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WQDV.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GOGB.L.

GOGB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WQDV.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GOGB.L and 0.38% for WQDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOGB.L and WQDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer