GOF vs. TY
GOF (Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Guggenheim, while TY (Tri-Continental Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GOF returned 7.99%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for TY. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOF vs. TY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOF achieves a -7.43% return, which is significantly lower than TY's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GOF has underperformed TY with an annualized return of 7.99%, while TY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.
GOF
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -7.43%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- -12.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
TY
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- 1Y
- 26.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
GOF vs. TY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -7.43% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
TY Tri-Continental Corporation | 8.72% | 16.12% | 22.01% | 17.86% | -16.32% | 29.45% | 12.38% | 28.60% | -5.84% | 28.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOF and TY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2007 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOF vs. TY — Risk / Return Rank
GOF
TY
GOF vs. TY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and Tri-Continental Corporation (TY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOF | TY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.52 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 3.88 | -4.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 16.60 | -17.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOF | TY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 2.74 | -3.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.76 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.87 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.33 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
GOF vs. TY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOF drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, smaller than the maximum TY drawdown of -67.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOF and TY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOF | TY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -67.71% | +13.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.24% | -6.79% | -16.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.56% | -16.09% | -12.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.41% | -20.78% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | -38.57% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.55% | -0.45% | -17.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -15.61% | +8.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.18% | 1.58% | +10.60% |
Volatility
GOF vs. TY - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Tri-Continental Corporation (TY) at 1.74%. This indicates that GOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOF | TY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 1.74% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 7.50% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 9.61% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 14.20% | +3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 16.51% | +3.01% |
Dividends
GOF vs. TY - Dividend Comparison
GOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.79%, more than TY's 11.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 19.79% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
TY Tri-Continental Corporation | 11.13% | 11.97% | 10.61% | 4.36% | 8.71% | 14.13% | 6.25% | 6.86% | 8.13% | 4.69% | 4.12% | 4.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOF and TY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOF has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to TY (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOF dropped -54.66% vs TY's -67.71%.
TY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOF and TY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer