TY vs. IJS
TY (Tri-Continental Corporation) is a stock, while IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Over the past 10 years, TY returned 14.62%/yr vs 10.48%/yr for IJS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TY vs. IJS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TY achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than IJS's 17.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TY has outperformed IJS with an annualized return of 14.62%, while IJS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.48% annualized return.
TY
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
IJS
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 17.37%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- 1Y
- 37.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
TY vs. IJS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TY Tri-Continental Corporation | 9.43% | 16.12% | 22.01% | 17.86% | -16.32% | 29.45% | 12.38% | 28.60% | -5.84% | 28.47% |
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 17.37% | 6.54% | 7.33% | 14.68% | -11.34% | 30.53% | 2.63% | 24.11% | -12.86% | 11.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between TY and IJS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.76 |
The correlation between TY and IJS shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TY vs. IJS — Risk / Return Rank
TY
IJS
TY vs. IJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tri-Continental Corporation (TY) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TY | IJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 4.04 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.97 | 13.28 | +2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TY vs. IJS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TY drawdown since its inception was -67.71%, which is greater than IJS's maximum drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TY and IJS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TY | IJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.71% | -60.11% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -9.28% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.09% | -28.65% | +12.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -28.65% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.57% | -47.68% | +9.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -1.64% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.59% | -9.87% | -5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 2.82% | -1.22% |
Volatility
TY vs. IJS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tri-Continental Corporation (TY) is 3.58%, while iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that TY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TY | IJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 4.85% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 11.82% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 18.34% | -8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 21.94% | -7.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 23.59% | -7.07% |
Dividends
TY vs. IJS - Dividend Comparison
TY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than IJS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 1.36% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.42% | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.00% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.59% |
TY Tri-Continental Corporation | 10.68% | 11.97% | 10.61% | 4.36% | 8.71% | 14.13% | 6.25% | 6.86% | 8.13% | 4.69% | 4.12% | 4.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TY and IJS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJS has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to TY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TY dropped -67.71% vs IJS's -60.11%.
TY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TY and IJS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer