GOF vs. HQH
GOF (Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Guggenheim, while HQH (Tekla Healthcare Investors) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GOF returned 7.48%/yr vs 8.13%/yr for HQH. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOF vs. HQH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOF achieves a -7.57% return, which is significantly lower than HQH's 17.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GOF has underperformed HQH with an annualized return of 7.48%, while HQH has yielded a comparatively higher 8.13% annualized return.
GOF
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -7.57%
- 1Y
- -14.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.90%
HQH
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- YTD
- 17.49%
- 1Y
- 47.23%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.47%
GOF vs. HQH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -7.57% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
HQH Tekla Healthcare Investors | 17.49% | 34.12% | 10.22% | 1.22% | -17.27% | 7.99% | 24.82% | 26.80% | -13.08% | 15.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOF and HQH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOF vs. HQH — Risk / Return Rank
GOF
HQH
GOF vs. HQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOF | HQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.37 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 3.65 | -4.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 12.50 | -13.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOF vs. HQH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOF drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, smaller than the maximum HQH drawdown of -62.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOF and HQH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOF | HQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -62.36% | +7.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.24% | -13.01% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.56% | -21.14% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.41% | -37.55% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | -37.55% | -0.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.67% | -5.34% | -12.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -20.99% | +13.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.68% | 3.79% | +9.89% |
Volatility
GOF vs. HQH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) is 3.07%, while Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that GOF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOF | HQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 5.64% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 14.89% | -4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.18% | 20.61% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 19.72% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 21.39% | -1.86% |
Dividends
GOF vs. HQH - Dividend Comparison
GOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.50%, more than HQH's 11.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 20.50% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
HQH Tekla Healthcare Investors | 11.10% | 11.56% | 14.21% | 9.66% | 9.50% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 8.24% | 10.75% | 8.78% | 9.80% | 11.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOF and HQH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HQH has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to GOF (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOF dropped -54.66% vs HQH's -62.36%.
HQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOF and HQH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer