HQH vs. VUG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG).

VUG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2000.

Performance

HQH vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HQH vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HQH Tekla Healthcare Investors	-0.42%	34.12%	10.22%	1.22%	-17.27%	7.99%	24.82%	26.80%	-13.08%	15.97%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	-9.39%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	27.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQH achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's -9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, HQH has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 6.86%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.16% annualized return.

HQH

• 1D: 2.75%
• 1M: -3.18%
• YTD: -0.42%
• 6M: 4.66%
• 1Y: 31.01%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 4.87%
• 10Y*: 6.86%

VUG

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: -9.39%
• 6M: -8.17%
• 1Y: 18.52%
• 3Y*: 21.59%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 16.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HQH vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQH

HQH Risk / Return Rank: 77
HQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
HQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
HQH Omega Ratio Rank: 73
HQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
HQH Martin Ratio Rank: 83

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 44
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQH vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HQH	VUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	0.82	+0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.32	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.19	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	1.19	+0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.04	4.15	+2.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HQH vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQH and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HQH	VUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	0.82	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.53	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.76	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.57	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between HQH and VUG is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HQH vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

HQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.31%, more than VUG's 0.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HQH Tekla Healthcare Investors	12.31%	11.56%	14.21%	9.66%	9.50%	8.59%	7.97%	8.24%	10.75%	8.78%	9.80%	11.97%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.45%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Drawdowns

HQH vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQH drawdown since its inception was -62.36%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQH and VUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HQH	VUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.36%	-50.68%	-11.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.01%	-16.53%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.55%	-35.61%	-1.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.55%	-35.61%	-1.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.82%	-12.25%	+4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.13%	-7.13%	-14.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	4.72%	-0.76%

Volatility

HQH vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 7.12%. This indicates that HQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HQH	VUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	7.12%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.02%	12.70%	+3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.44%	22.70%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.47%	22.22%	-2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.65%	21.38%	+0.27%