GOF vs. BST
GOF (Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Guggenheim, while BST (BlackRock Science and Technology Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GOF returned 8.03%/yr vs 20.10%/yr for BST. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOF vs. BST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOF achieves a -7.43% return, which is significantly lower than BST's 21.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GOF has underperformed BST with an annualized return of 8.03%, while BST has yielded a comparatively higher 20.10% annualized return.
GOF
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -7.43%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- -12.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
BST
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 21.48%
- 6M
- 27.08%
- 1Y
- 42.06%
- 3Y*
- 22.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 20.10%
GOF vs. BST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -7.43% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
BST BlackRock Science and Technology Trust | 21.48% | 23.65% | 17.96% | 30.07% | -38.28% | -0.35% | 69.27% | 34.57% | 8.84% | 57.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOF and BST is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2014 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOF vs. BST — Risk / Return Rank
GOF
BST
GOF vs. BST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOF | BST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.39 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 2.76 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 8.87 | -9.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOF vs. BST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOF drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, which is greater than BST's maximum drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOF and BST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOF | BST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -47.72% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.24% | -15.31% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.56% | -23.37% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.41% | -47.72% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | -47.72% | +9.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.55% | -4.13% | -13.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -12.96% | +5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.53% | 4.76% | +7.77% |
Volatility
GOF vs. BST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) is 3.50%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that GOF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOF | BST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 9.75% | -6.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 16.86% | -5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.97% | 19.44% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 23.81% | -5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 25.83% | -6.31% |
Dividends
GOF vs. BST - Dividend Comparison
GOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.79%, more than BST's 8.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BST BlackRock Science and Technology Trust | 8.79% | 10.36% | 8.21% | 8.91% | 10.57% | 5.38% | 3.85% | 10.52% | 6.41% | 4.80% | 6.69% | 6.93% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 19.79% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOF and BST have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BST has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to GOF (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOF dropped -54.66% vs BST's -47.72%.
BST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOF and BST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer