GOEX vs. EWP
GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) and EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOEX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while EWP is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Spain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GOEX returned 12.61%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for EWP. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOEX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWP.
Performance
GOEX vs. EWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOEX achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 8.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GOEX having a 12.61% annualized return and EWP not far behind at 12.33%.
GOEX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -9.61%
- 1Y
- 52.15%
- 3Y*
- 44.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
EWP
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 32.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
GOEX vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -10.45% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 8.89% | 78.03% | 5.70% | 30.26% | -5.18% | 0.25% | -3.94% | 11.93% | -15.32% | 26.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOEX and EWP is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2010 | 0.25 |
The correlation between GOEX and EWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GOEX vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GOEX
EWP
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GOEX
EWP
-
Communication Services
GOEX
-
EWP
Consumer Cyclical
GOEX
-
EWP
Consumer Defensive
GOEX
-
EWP
-
Energy
GOEX
-
EWP
Financial Services
GOEX
-
EWP
Healthcare
GOEX
-
EWP
Industrials
GOEX
-
EWP
Real Estate
GOEX
-
EWP
Technology
GOEX
-
EWP
Utilities
GOEX
-
EWP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOEX vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank
GOEX
EWP
GOEX vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOEX | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 3.26 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 11.51 | -7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOEX vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOEX drawdown since its inception was -88.83%, which is greater than EWP's maximum drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOEX and EWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOEX | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.83% | -61.19% | -27.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.64% | -11.38% | -28.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.64% | -12.19% | -27.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -33.76% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.66% | -46.36% | -7.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.91% | 0.00% | -33.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -21.41% | -42.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.30% | 3.22% | +11.08% |
Volatility
GOEX vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison
Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) at 6.21%. This indicates that GOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOEX | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.04% | 6.21% | +10.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.66% | 16.09% | +25.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.58% | 19.13% | +31.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.35% | 20.31% | +19.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.12% | 22.22% | +17.90% |
GOEX vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOEX vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison
GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than EWP's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 2.09% | 2.27% | 4.35% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.29% | 2.56% | 3.72% | 3.69% | 2.72% | 4.65% | 3.85% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.32% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOEX and EWP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to EWP (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOEX dropped -88.83% vs EWP's -61.19%.
On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 12.61% vs 12.33% for EWP. On fees, EWP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWP has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 12.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.
GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 2.09% for EWP.
GOEX is categorized as Materials, while EWP is Europe Equities. GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GOEX and 0.50% for EWP.
EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOEX and EWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer