GOCT vs. HELO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GOCT (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOCT returned 16.19% vs 10.94% for HELO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.

Performance

GOCT vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOCT achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 2.26% return.

GOCT

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 16.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HELO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.72%
• 1Y: 10.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOCT vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GOCT FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October	5.59%	12.29%	8.16%	6.59%
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.26%	7.82%	18.05%	7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GOCT and HELO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2023	0.85

The correlation between GOCT and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

GOCT vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GOCT	HELO
Technology	36.2%	39.8%
Financial Services	11.9%	10.0%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	11.6%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.2%
Industrials	8.1%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.5%
Energy	3.5%	3.3%
Utilities	2.3%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.5%

Return for Risk

GOCT vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOCT

GOCT Risk / Return Rank: 84
GOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

HELO

HELO Risk / Return Rank: 51
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOCT vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GOCT	HELO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.77	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	2.50	+1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.36	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	1.91	+1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.45	8.44	+10.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GOCT vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOCT and HELO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOCT	HELO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	1.77	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.72	1.63	+0.09

Drawdowns

GOCT vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOCT drawdown since its inception was -10.47%, roughly equal to the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOCT and HELO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOCT	HELO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.47%	-10.89%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.40%	-5.76%	+1.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.32%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-1.18%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	1.30%	-0.42%

Volatility

GOCT vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) at 0.70%. This indicates that GOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOCT	HELO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.76%	0.70%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.72%	4.99%	-0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.04%	6.20%	-0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.45%	7.95%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.45%	7.95%	-0.50%

GOCT vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOCT vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

GOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GOCT FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.62%	0.67%	0.60%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOCT and HELO in my portfolio?

GOCT and HELO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GOCT or HELO?

GOCT has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to HELO (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOCT dropped -10.47% vs HELO's -10.89%.

Which ETF is better, GOCT or HELO?

On 1-year performance, GOCT leads with 16.19% vs 10.94% for HELO. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GOCT or HELO?

Over the 1-year period, GOCT has performed better with a 16.19% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOCT or HELO?

HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOCT or HELO?

HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for GOCT.

What is the main difference between GOCT and HELO?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GOCT and 0.50% for HELO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.