GOBSX vs. DAIOX
Compare and contrast key facts about BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) and Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX).
GOBSX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Oct 31, 2006. DAIOX is managed by Dunham. It was launched on Oct 31, 2013.
Performance
GOBSX vs. DAIOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOBSX vs. DAIOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOBSX BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund | -2.91% | 13.59% | -9.38% | 7.42% | -15.66% | -5.27% | 12.66% | 9.21% | -5.59% | 11.51% |
DAIOX Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund | -0.72% | 5.68% | 5.33% | 12.18% | -14.11% | -2.18% | 3.85% | 3.82% | -5.00% | 9.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOBSX achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly lower than DAIOX's -0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GOBSX has underperformed DAIOX with an annualized return of 0.73%, while DAIOX has yielded a comparatively higher 0.90% annualized return.
GOBSX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- -2.91%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 1.14%
- 5Y*
- -2.29%
- 10Y*
- 0.73%
DAIOX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GOBSX vs. DAIOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOBSX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DAIOX's 1.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GOBSX vs. DAIOX — Risk / Return Rank
GOBSX
DAIOX
GOBSX vs. DAIOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) and Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOBSX | DAIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.50 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 2.05 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.34 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.87 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | 7.90 | -4.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOBSX | DAIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.50 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 0.29 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.15 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.03 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between GOBSX and DAIOX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GOBSX vs. DAIOX - Dividend Comparison
GOBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than DAIOX's 3.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOBSX BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund | 2.79% | 4.28% | 3.80% | 0.09% | 6.70% | 2.30% | 0.31% | 1.56% | 3.15% | 3.68% | 1.87% | 2.61% |
DAIOX Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund | 3.90% | 4.22% | 4.16% | 4.56% | 7.17% | 2.88% | 2.23% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.11% | 1.10% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
GOBSX vs. DAIOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOBSX drawdown since its inception was -29.04%, which is greater than DAIOX's maximum drawdown of -27.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOBSX and DAIOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOBSX | DAIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.04% | -27.58% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -2.58% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.04% | -24.80% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.04% | -24.96% | -4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.57% | -2.58% | -11.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -9.34% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.61% | +1.10% |
Volatility
GOBSX vs. DAIOX - Volatility Comparison
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX) at 1.68%. This indicates that GOBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAIOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOBSX | DAIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 1.68% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.47% | 2.20% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.28% | 3.26% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 4.59% | +4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.49% | 5.94% | +2.55% |