PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOAT.L vs. TREG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOAT.L vs. TREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF A USD (GOAT.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GOAT.L is traded in USD, while TREG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TREG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOAT.L achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than TREG.L's 9.88% return.


GOAT.L

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.19%
6M
-4.36%
YTD
-0.11%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*

TREG.L

1D
0.32%
1M
1.74%
6M
8.50%
YTD
9.88%
1Y
16.50%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
2.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOAT.L vs. TREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GOAT.L
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF A USD
-0.11%25.59%9.45%10.88%-11.11%14.47%16.77%
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
9.88%14.68%1.06%13.30%-25.65%30.14%12.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GOAT.L and TREG.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2020

0.61

The correlation between GOAT.L and TREG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOAT.L vs. TREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOAT.L
GOAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GOAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GOAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TREG.L
TREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
TREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOAT.L vs. TREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF A USD (GOAT.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOAT.LTREG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.50

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.77

5.11

-3.34

GOAT.L vs. TREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOAT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the TREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOAT.L and TREG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOAT.L vs. TREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOAT.L drawdown since its inception was -23.97%, smaller than the maximum TREG.L drawdown of -52.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOAT.L and TREG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOAT.LTREG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.97%

-52.53%

+28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-10.92%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.39%

-17.05%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.97%

-33.44%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-0.98%

-4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-16.86%

+11.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

3.22%

+1.11%

Volatility

GOAT.L vs. TREG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF A USD (GOAT.L) is 3.18%, while VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that GOAT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOAT.LTREG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.73%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

10.17%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

12.43%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

16.74%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

18.15%

-2.66%

GOAT.L vs. TREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOAT.L has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TREG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOAT.L vs. TREG.L - Dividend Comparison

GOAT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TREG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOAT.L
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF A USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
3.34%3.57%3.48%3.64%4.54%1.82%4.49%3.41%3.83%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOAT.L and TREG.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TREG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GOAT.L.

GOAT.L is categorized as Global Equities, while TREG.L is REIT. GOAT.L tracks VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF A USD, while TREG.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GOAT.L and 0.25% for TREG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOAT.L and TREG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer