PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNOM vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNOM vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNOM achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -0.74% return.


GNOM

1D
3.47%
1M
11.33%
YTD
11.56%
6M
9.34%
1Y
57.90%
3Y*
0.45%
5Y*
-9.59%
10Y*

SHLD

1D
1.58%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-0.74%
6M
2.22%
1Y
11.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNOM vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GNOM
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF
11.56%18.65%-15.99%4.22%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-0.74%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GNOM and SHLD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

0.36

GNOM vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GNOM
SHLD

Healthcare

99.6%

-

Technology

0.4%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

88.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

GNOM
99.6%
SHLD

-

Technology

GNOM
0.4%
SHLD
11.8%

Basic Materials

GNOM

-

SHLD

-

Communication Services

GNOM

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

GNOM

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

GNOM

-

SHLD

-

Energy

GNOM

-

SHLD

-

Financial Services

GNOM

-

SHLD

-

Industrials

GNOM

-

SHLD
88.2%

Real Estate

GNOM

-

SHLD

-

Utilities

GNOM

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNOM vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNOM
GNOM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GNOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNOM vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNOMSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.10

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

0.58

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

1.52

+7.69

GNOM vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNOM and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNOMSHLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

0.48

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

2.03

-2.11

Drawdowns

GNOM vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNOM drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNOM and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNOMSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.00%

-20.10%

-54.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.17%

-20.10%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.90%

-17.57%

-36.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-3.21%

-37.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

7.60%

-1.30%

Volatility

GNOM vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) at 8.02%. This indicates that GNOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNOMSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.77%

8.02%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.72%

19.39%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.66%

24.08%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.61%

21.14%

+12.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.19%

21.14%

+13.05%

GNOM vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GNOM and SHLD have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

GNOM vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

GNOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than SHLD's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GNOM
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF
1.23%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.14%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.55%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GNOM and SHLD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNOM has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to SHLD (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNOM dropped -75.00% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, GNOM leads with 57.90% vs 11.52% for SHLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GNOM has performed better with a 57.90% return vs 11.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GNOM and SHLD have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

GNOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.55% for SHLD.

GNOM is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. GNOM tracks Solactive Genomics Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index.

GNOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNOM and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer