PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOM.L) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GNOM.L is traded in USD, while GNOG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GNOG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GNOM.L having a 22.10% return and GNOG.L slightly higher at 22.32%.


GNOM.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
11.69%
6M
15.71%
YTD
22.10%
1Y
62.79%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
10Y*

GNOG.L

1D
0.46%
1M
12.17%
6M
15.97%
YTD
22.32%
1Y
63.49%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GNOM.L
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF
22.10%19.30%-17.99%-5.77%-37.21%-8.59%
GNOG.L
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF
22.32%20.47%-18.41%-6.60%-37.25%-32.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GNOM.L and GNOG.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.96

The correlation between GNOM.L and GNOG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNOM.L
GNOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GNOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GNOG.L
GNOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GNOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOM.L) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GNOM.LGNOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.34

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

9.08

+0.08

GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNOM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the GNOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNOM.L and GNOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNOM.L drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, smaller than the maximum GNOG.L drawdown of -77.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNOM.L and GNOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNOM.LGNOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.32%

-77.33%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.91%

-18.91%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.77%

-44.90%

+0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.11%

-53.57%

+16.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.16%

-61.00%

+13.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

6.97%

-0.05%

Volatility

GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOM.L) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L) at 7.87%. This indicates that GNOM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNOM.LGNOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

7.87%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

21.26%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.87%

29.03%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.11%

37.09%

-3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.11%

37.09%

-3.98%

GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GNOM.L and GNOG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

GNOM.L vs. GNOG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GNOM.L nor GNOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GNOM.L and GNOG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GNOM.L and GNOG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

GNOM.L tracks Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF, while GNOG.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNOM.L and GNOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer