PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNLN vs. WTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GNLN vs. WTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) and W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNLN achieves a -84.63% return, which is significantly lower than WTI's 121.48% return.


GNLN

1D
9.04%
1M
-14.98%
6M
-83.70%
YTD
-84.63%
1Y
-93.65%
3Y*
-96.84%
5Y*
-96.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-92.74%

WTI

1D
3.76%
1M
16.18%
6M
66.36%
YTD
121.48%
1Y
114.71%
3Y*
-4.31%
5Y*
-1.39%
10Y*
7.75%
ALL TIME*
-6.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$49.59K$65.87K$63.37K
$14.50M$14.39M$19.55M

GNLN vs. WTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GNLN
Greenlane Holdings, Inc.
-84.63%-99.87%-71.04%-81.98%-98.51%-75.65%21.66%-88.78%
WTI
W&T Offshore, Inc.
121.48%0.62%-48.17%-41.41%72.76%48.85%-60.97%-16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GNLN and WTI is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.12

The correlation between GNLN and WTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GNLN:

$362.38K

WTI:

$534.11M

EPS

GNLN:

-$19.28K

WTI:

-$0.95

PS Ratio

GNLN:

0.00

WTI:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

GNLN:

$4.36M

WTI:

$521.61M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GNLN:

-$12.47M

WTI:

$15.24M

EBITDA (TTM)

GNLN:

-$83.91M

WTI:

$68.54M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNLN vs. WTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GNLN
GNLN Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GNLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNLN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GNLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNLN Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

WTI
WTI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
WTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
WTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GNLN vs. WTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) and W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GNLNWTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.25

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

2.66

-3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

5.33

-6.76

GNLN vs. WTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNLN Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the WTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNLN and WTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GNLN vs. WTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNLN drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum WTI drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNLN and WTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNLNWTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-97.59%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.94%

-40.17%

-54.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-100.00%

-74.31%

-25.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

-87.31%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-91.63%

-8.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.16%

-74.20%

-19.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.83%

20.00%

+45.83%

Volatility

GNLN vs. WTI - Volatility Comparison

Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) and W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI) have volatilities of 22.54% and 23.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNLNWTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.54%

23.17%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

113.09%

72.21%

+40.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

127.91%

86.03%

+41.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

221.39%

69.93%

+151.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

193.41%

73.67%

+119.74%

Dividends

GNLN vs. WTI - Dividend Comparison

GNLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


PositionTTM202520242023
GNLN
Greenlane Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTI
W&T Offshore, Inc.
1.11%2.45%2.41%0.31%

Financials

GNLN vs. WTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greenlane Holdings, Inc. and W&T Offshore, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GNLN and WTI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTI has higher volatility (23.17%) compared to GNLN (22.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNLN dropped -100.00% vs WTI's -97.59%.

WTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNLN and WTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer