GNLN vs. WTI
GNLN (Greenlane Holdings, Inc.) and WTI (W&T Offshore, Inc.) are both stocks. GNLN operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive), while WTI operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, GNLN returned -96.53%/yr vs -6.02%/yr for WTI. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GNLN vs. WTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNLN achieves a -79.22% return, which is significantly lower than WTI's 104.20% return.
GNLN
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -14.71%
- YTD
- -79.22%
- 6M
- -86.12%
- 1Y
- -95.00%
- 3Y*
- -97.28%
- 5Y*
- -96.53%
- 10Y*
- —
WTI
- 1D
- 3.12%
- 1M
- -25.28%
- YTD
- 104.20%
- 6M
- 98.12%
- 1Y
- 56.53%
- 3Y*
- -1.92%
- 5Y*
- -6.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.65%
GNLN vs. WTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNLN Greenlane Holdings, Inc. | -79.22% | -99.87% | -71.04% | -81.98% | -98.51% | -75.65% | 21.66% | -88.78% |
WTI W&T Offshore, Inc. | 104.20% | 0.62% | -48.17% | -41.41% | 72.76% | 48.85% | -60.97% | -16.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNLN and WTI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019 | 0.13 |
The correlation between GNLN and WTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GNLN:
$19.55K
WTI:
$492.46M
GNLN:
-$251.93
WTI:
-$0.96
GNLN:
0.20
WTI:
0.94
GNLN:
$4.36M
WTI:
$521.61M
GNLN:
-$12.47M
WTI:
$15.24M
GNLN:
-$83.91M
WTI:
$68.54M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNLN vs. WTI — Risk / Return Rank
GNLN
WTI
GNLN vs. WTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) and W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GNLN | WTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.18 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 1.41 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 3.06 | -4.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GNLN vs. WTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNLN drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum WTI drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNLN and WTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNLN | WTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -97.59% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.66% | -40.17% | -55.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -100.00% | -74.31% | -25.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -87.31% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -92.29% | -7.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.07% | -74.11% | -19.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.45% | 19.41% | +51.04% |
Volatility
GNLN vs. WTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) is 24.22%, while W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI) has a volatility of 30.06%. This indicates that GNLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNLN | WTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.22% | 30.06% | -5.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 113.73% | 70.28% | +43.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 157.49% | 85.99% | +71.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 221.62% | 69.66% | +151.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 194.68% | 73.55% | +121.13% |
Dividends
GNLN vs. WTI - Dividend Comparison
GNLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GNLN Greenlane Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTI W&T Offshore, Inc. | 1.21% | 2.45% | 2.41% | 0.31% |
Financials
GNLN vs. WTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greenlane Holdings, Inc. and W&T Offshore, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GNLN and WTI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTI has higher volatility (30.06%) compared to GNLN (24.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNLN dropped -100.00% vs WTI's -97.59%.
WTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNLN and WTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer