PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMXAX vs. QCGDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMXAX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMXAX achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly lower than QCGDX's 16.31% return.


GMXAX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.36%
YTD
12.95%
6M
14.04%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
9.33%

QCGDX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.29%
YTD
16.31%
6M
17.42%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
13.09%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMXAX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GMXAX
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund
12.95%6.84%12.15%15.89%-13.45%24.33%12.79%0.13%
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
16.31%1.02%9.87%14.74%-12.23%32.19%14.65%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GMXAX and QCGDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.81

The correlation between GMXAX and QCGDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMXAX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMXAX
GMXAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GMXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GMXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QCGDX
QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMXAX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMXAXQCGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

1.82

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

2.69

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.90

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.16

14.23

-4.07

GMXAX vs. QCGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMXAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the QCGDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMXAX and QCGDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMXAXQCGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.82

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.59

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.68

-0.28

Drawdowns

GMXAX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMXAX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMXAX and QCGDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMXAXQCGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.64%

-22.37%

-33.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-5.55%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.21%

-16.10%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.21%

-20.18%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.85%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-6.13%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

1.52%

+0.91%

Volatility

GMXAX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) at 3.20%. This indicates that GMXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMXAXQCGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

3.20%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

9.13%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

11.67%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

14.74%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

16.45%

+4.85%

GMXAX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMXAX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMXAX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison

GMXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than QCGDX's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMXAX
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund
11.54%12.93%11.73%6.17%9.58%12.52%3.18%5.18%23.21%0.85%9.60%13.94%
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
0.60%0.69%4.42%0.22%0.00%5.44%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMXAX and QCGDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMXAX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to QCGDX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMXAX dropped -55.64% vs QCGDX's -22.37%.

QCGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMXAX and QCGDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer