GMVM.DE vs. 5HED.DE
GMVM.DE (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) and 5HED.DE (Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GMVM.DE tracks the Morningstar US Sustainable Moat Focus while 5HED.DE tracks the Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GMVM.DE returned 4.14%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for 5HED.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMVM.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 5HED.DE.
Performance
GMVM.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GMVM.DE is traded in EUR, while 5HED.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 5HED.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMVM.DE achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than 5HED.DE's -0.34% return.
GMVM.DE
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
5HED.DE
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- 1.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- —
GMVM.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMVM.DE VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF | -1.57% | -4.56% | 17.59% | 14.37% | -14.38% | 36.91% | 2.73% | 38.45% | -1.88% |
5HED.DE Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) | -0.34% | -7.59% | 10.48% | 12.57% | -11.75% | 32.56% | 12.72% | 34.00% | -5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMVM.DE and 5HED.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between GMVM.DE and 5HED.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMVM.DE vs. 5HED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GMVM.DE
5HED.DE
GMVM.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GMVM.DE) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMVM.DE | 5HED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.06 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.51 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMVM.DE | 5HED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.30 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.21 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.48 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
GMVM.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMVM.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.25%, roughly equal to the maximum 5HED.DE drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMVM.DE and 5HED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMVM.DE | 5HED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.25% | -32.31% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -6.99% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.74% | -21.72% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -21.72% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -11.81% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -6.47% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 2.81% | +1.88% |
Volatility
GMVM.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GMVM.DE) is 3.23%, while Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that GMVM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5HED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMVM.DE | 5HED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 3.81% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 8.60% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.33% | 11.79% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 15.59% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 17.50% | -0.96% |
GMVM.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMVM.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than 5HED.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMVM.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GMVM.DE nor 5HED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GMVM.DE and 5HED.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMVM.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMVM.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HED.DE.
GMVM.DE tracks Morningstar US Sustainable Moat Focus, while 5HED.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GMVM.DE and 0.75% for 5HED.DE.
Find the right allocation for GMVM.DE and 5HED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer