GMVIX vs. FZAMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GMVIX (Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value Fund) and FZAMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GMVIX returned 10.03%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for FZAMX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GMVIX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FZAMX.

Performance

GMVIX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (GMVIX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMVIX achieves a 18.52% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 21.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GMVIX has underperformed FZAMX with an annualized return of 10.03%, while FZAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.

GMVIX

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 18.52%
• 6M: 17.64%
• 1Y: 30.90%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 7.24%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

FZAMX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 6M: 22.92%
• 1Y: 38.64%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMVIX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMVIX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value Fund	18.52%	5.69%	12.12%	11.65%	-15.56%	30.70%	7.97%	26.56%	-15.06%	15.26%
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	21.57%	12.00%	17.39%	15.15%	-14.70%	25.40%	18.84%	23.85%	-14.85%	20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GMVIX and FZAMX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.96

The correlation between GMVIX and FZAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMVIX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMVIX

GMVIX Risk / Return Rank: 50
GMVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GMVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
GMVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GMVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GMVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FZAMX

FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMVIX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (GMVIX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMVIX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.35	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	3.19	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.41	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	4.12	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.90	16.56	-3.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMVIX vs. FZAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMVIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FZAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMVIX and FZAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMVIX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	2.35	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.56	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.59	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.57	-0.15

Drawdowns

GMVIX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMVIX drawdown since its inception was -44.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FZAMX drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMVIX and FZAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMVIX	FZAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.31%	-42.32%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-9.77%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.49%	-25.24%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.49%	-25.24%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.31%	-42.32%	-1.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-6.08%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	2.43%	+0.12%

Volatility

GMVIX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (GMVIX) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) at 5.00%. This indicates that GMVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMVIX	FZAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	5.00%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.30%	13.74%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	17.14%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.33%	20.23%	+0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.31%	20.94%	+0.37%

GMVIX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMVIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMVIX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison

GMVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than FZAMX's 5.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	5.80%	10.09%	6.93%	2.83%	5.86%	18.58%	1.41%	3.50%	10.72%	7.81%	5.00%	4.90%
GMVIX Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value Fund	4.88%	5.78%	3.17%	0.82%	7.90%	5.77%	0.50%	0.83%	7.58%	4.40%	0.68%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMVIX and FZAMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, GMVIX and FZAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GMVIX or FZAMX?

GMVIX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to FZAMX (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMVIX dropped -44.31% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.