GMUN vs. TAXS
GMUN (Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF) and TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - GMUN tracks the Bloomberg Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Index while TAXS tracks the ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMUN charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXS.
Performance
GMUN vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMUN achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than TAXS's 0.99% return.
GMUN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMUN vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMUN Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF | -0.34% | 3.35% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.99% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMUN and TAXS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMUN vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank
GMUN
TAXS
GMUN vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMUN | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMUN | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 2.85 | -1.85 |
Drawdowns
GMUN vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMUN drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMUN and TAXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMUN | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -0.84% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.29% | -0.03% | -2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -0.24% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility
GMUN vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMUN | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42% | 1.00% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 1.00% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 1.00% | +1.96% |
GMUN vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMUN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GMUN vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison
GMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than TAXS's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GMUN Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF | 3.12% | 2.94% | 3.22% | 2.20% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.82% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMUN and TAXS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GMUN.
GMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.82% for TAXS.
GMUN tracks Bloomberg Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Index, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GMUN and 0.05% for TAXS.
Find the right allocation for GMUN and TAXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer