PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMTZX vs. PLWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMTZX vs. PLWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) and Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund (PLWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMTZX achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than PLWIX's 4.13% return. Over the past 10 years, GMTZX has underperformed PLWIX with an annualized return of 5.89%, while PLWIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.32% annualized return.


GMTZX

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.61%
YTD
4.68%
6M
4.99%
1Y
12.49%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*
5.89%

PLWIX

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.28%
YTD
4.13%
6M
4.34%
1Y
11.72%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMTZX vs. PLWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMTZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund
4.68%11.55%7.50%10.86%-13.11%6.74%9.16%15.10%-3.68%11.68%
PLWIX
Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund
4.13%11.32%12.21%12.23%-14.36%9.05%12.70%18.40%-5.72%14.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GMTZX and PLWIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.97

The correlation between GMTZX and PLWIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMTZX vs. PLWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMTZX
GMTZX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GMTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GMTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PLWIX
PLWIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PLWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PLWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMTZX vs. PLWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) and Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund (PLWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMTZXPLWIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.53

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.00

11.31

+0.70

GMTZX vs. PLWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMTZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the PLWIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMTZX and PLWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMTZXPLWIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.04

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.63

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.86

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.53

-0.07

Drawdowns

GMTZX vs. PLWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMTZX drawdown since its inception was -43.84%, smaller than the maximum PLWIX drawdown of -49.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMTZX and PLWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMTZXPLWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.84%

-49.07%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-4.75%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.32%

-6.97%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

-19.73%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.83%

-20.29%

+2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.47%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-5.72%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.06%

+0.02%

Volatility

GMTZX vs. PLWIX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) and Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund (PLWIX) have volatilities of 1.99% and 1.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMTZXPLWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

1.96%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.67%

4.80%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.72%

5.91%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

8.24%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.31%

8.57%

-1.26%

GMTZX vs. PLWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMTZX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than PLWIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMTZX vs. PLWIX - Dividend Comparison

GMTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than PLWIX's 9.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMTZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund
5.40%5.66%6.34%3.77%7.27%5.35%3.64%4.01%6.38%2.62%1.45%15.43%
PLWIX
Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund
9.68%10.08%11.91%5.12%9.82%9.40%5.90%8.69%7.35%5.74%3.73%8.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GMTZX and PLWIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GMTZX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to PLWIX (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMTZX dropped -43.84% vs PLWIX's -49.07%.

GMTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMTZX and PLWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer