PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMTZX vs. FIRMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMTZX vs. FIRMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMTZX achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly higher than FIRMX's 3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, GMTZX has outperformed FIRMX with an annualized return of 5.98%, while FIRMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.


GMTZX

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.38%
YTD
4.10%
6M
3.79%
1Y
10.76%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
5.98%

FIRMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
3.60%
6M
3.40%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
7.18%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMTZX vs. FIRMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMTZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund
4.10%11.55%7.50%10.86%-13.11%6.74%9.16%15.10%-3.68%11.68%
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
3.60%9.95%4.29%8.07%-11.66%2.77%8.57%10.57%-1.80%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GMTZX and FIRMX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007

0.92

The correlation between GMTZX and FIRMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMTZX vs. FIRMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMTZX
GMTZX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GMTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GMTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRMX
FIRMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FIRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMTZX vs. FIRMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMTZXFIRMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.77

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

11.63

-1.14

GMTZX vs. FIRMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMTZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FIRMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMTZX and FIRMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMTZX vs. FIRMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMTZX drawdown since its inception was -43.84%, which is greater than FIRMX's maximum drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMTZX and FIRMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMTZXFIRMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.84%

-33.73%

-10.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-3.44%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.32%

-4.96%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

-16.11%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.83%

-16.11%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.42%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-3.70%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.82%

+0.28%

Volatility

GMTZX vs. FIRMX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) at 2.02%. This indicates that GMTZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIRMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMTZXFIRMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.02%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.17%

3.70%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.14%

4.36%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

5.32%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.30%

4.54%

+2.76%

GMTZX vs. FIRMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMTZX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FIRMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMTZX vs. FIRMX - Dividend Comparison

GMTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than FIRMX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
3.25%3.13%3.02%2.81%4.54%3.56%2.48%2.59%4.65%8.57%1.67%1.68%
GMTZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund
5.43%5.66%6.34%3.77%7.27%5.35%3.64%4.01%6.38%2.62%1.45%15.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, GMTZX and FIRMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GMTZX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to FIRMX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMTZX dropped -43.84% vs FIRMX's -33.73%.

FIRMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMTZX and FIRMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer