GMSAX vs. MFTFX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GMSAX (Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A) and MFTFX (Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 10 years, GMSAX returned 2.63%/yr vs 4.93%/yr for MFTFX. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 1.54% expense ratio.

Performance

GMSAX vs. MFTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (GMSAX) and Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMSAX achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly lower than MFTFX's 8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GMSAX has underperformed MFTFX with an annualized return of 2.63%, while MFTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.93% annualized return.

GMSAX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 2.14%
• 6M: 4.37%
• YTD: 6.94%
• 1Y: 17.32%
• 3Y*: -0.38%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: 2.63%
• ALL TIME*: 2.15%

MFTFX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 0.45%
• 6M: 1.21%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 1Y: 39.25%
• 3Y*: 1.69%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: 4.93%
• ALL TIME*: 2.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GMSAX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MFTFX Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GMSAX vs. MFTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMSAX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A	6.94%	0.22%	-5.31%	-4.18%	20.08%	4.68%	6.64%	2.29%	-2.37%	2.29%
MFTFX Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund	8.99%	9.29%	6.87%	-13.57%	57.88%	2.13%	-4.13%	15.17%	-19.70%	19.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GMSAX and MFTFX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.61

The correlation between GMSAX and MFTFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GMSAX vs. MFTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMSAX

GMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 78
GMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
GMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

MFTFX

MFTFX Risk / Return Rank: 72
MFTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
MFTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MFTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MFTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
MFTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMSAX vs. MFTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (GMSAX) and Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMSAX	MFTFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.79	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.38	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.31	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	3.50	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.69	8.76	+0.93

GMSAX vs. MFTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the MFTFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMSAX and MFTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMSAX vs. MFTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMSAX drawdown since its inception was -23.58%, smaller than the maximum MFTFX drawdown of -35.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMSAX and MFTFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMSAX	MFTFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.58%	-35.70%	+12.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-9.83%	+5.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.56%	-32.57%	+10.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.58%	-32.57%	+8.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.58%	-35.70%	+12.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.14%	-7.23%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.26%	-16.87%	+9.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	3.93%	-2.26%

Volatility

GMSAX vs. MFTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (GMSAX) is 2.82%, while Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that GMSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMSAX	MFTFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	5.71%	-2.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.89%	12.32%	-5.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.54%	19.54%	-11.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.46%	21.85%	-11.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.12%	22.08%	-12.96%

GMSAX vs. MFTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GMSAX and MFTFX have an expense ratio of 1.54%.

Dividends

GMSAX vs. MFTFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMSAX nor MFTFX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMSAX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	20.24%	7.31%	1.24%	6.90%	0.16%	0.49%	0.00%	3.88%
MFTFX Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.75%	41.04%	2.30%	0.00%	20.00%	7.84%	2.12%	9.36%	1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMSAX and MFTFX in my portfolio?

GMSAX and MFTFX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMSAX or MFTFX?

MFTFX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to GMSAX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMSAX dropped -23.58% vs MFTFX's -35.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.