PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMRAX vs. NWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMRAX vs. NWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX) and Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMRAX achieves a 20.34% return, which is significantly higher than NWLSX's 8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GMRAX has outperformed NWLSX with an annualized return of 10.91%, while NWLSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.50% annualized return.


GMRAX

1D
2.12%
1M
3.94%
YTD
20.34%
6M
16.79%
1Y
42.36%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
10.91%

NWLSX

1D
0.89%
1M
1.49%
YTD
8.28%
6M
8.20%
1Y
20.37%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMRAX vs. NWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMRAX
Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund
20.34%12.26%9.12%17.56%-20.82%14.27%19.59%24.87%-10.71%14.21%
NWLSX
Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund
8.28%16.16%10.17%17.00%-17.70%13.33%12.81%18.63%-8.01%15.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GMRAX and NWLSX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007

0.89

The correlation between GMRAX and NWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMRAX vs. NWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMRAX
GMRAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GMRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GMRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NWLSX
NWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMRAX vs. NWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX) and Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMRAXNWLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

2.91

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

12.81

+0.69

GMRAX vs. NWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the NWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMRAX and NWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMRAX vs. NWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMRAX drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, which is greater than NWLSX's maximum drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMRAX and NWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMRAXNWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.36%

-52.58%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-6.88%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.67%

-10.73%

-16.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.00%

-29.54%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.78%

-30.59%

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.57%

-8.55%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

1.56%

+1.57%

Volatility

GMRAX vs. NWLSX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) at 3.78%. This indicates that GMRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMRAXNWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

3.78%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

7.84%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.73%

9.34%

+10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.73%

13.02%

+9.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

13.74%

+9.86%

GMRAX vs. NWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMRAX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than NWLSX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMRAX vs. NWLSX - Dividend Comparison

GMRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than NWLSX's 7.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMRAX
Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund
2.09%2.45%4.99%0.52%1.51%6.81%0.56%7.38%46.93%17.82%7.14%12.55%
NWLSX
Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund
7.57%8.36%14.07%7.04%2.15%9.62%5.85%6.95%11.27%7.78%6.64%5.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMRAX and NWLSX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMRAX has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to NWLSX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMRAX dropped -59.36% vs NWLSX's -52.58%.

NWLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMRAX and NWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer