PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOV vs. SPLW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMOV vs. SPLW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMOV vs. SPLW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GMOV
GMO U.S. Value ETF
2.77%14.81%-1.27%
SPLW.L
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc
2.26%4.80%-2.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOV achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly higher than SPLW.L's 2.26% return.


GMOV

1D
-0.06%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
2.77%
6M
7.12%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPLW.L

1D
0.82%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
2.26%
6M
1.18%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GMOV vs. SPLW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLW.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GMOV vs. SPLW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOV
GMOV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GMOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLW.L
SPLW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SPLW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOV vs. SPLW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMOVSPLW.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

0.00

+1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

0.09

+1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.01

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

-0.03

+1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.04

-0.10

+6.14

GMOV vs. SPLW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the SPLW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMOV and SPLW.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMOVSPLW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.00

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.44

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between GMOV and SPLW.L is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GMOV vs. SPLW.L - Dividend Comparison

GMOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, while SPLW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
GMOV
GMO U.S. Value ETF
2.17%1.98%0.30%
SPLW.L
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GMOV vs. SPLW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, roughly equal to the maximum SPLW.L drawdown of -17.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOV and SPLW.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMOVSPLW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-17.23%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-9.44%

-2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-5.08%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-5.08%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.89%

-0.07%

Volatility

GMOV vs. SPLW.L - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) have volatilities of 3.27% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMOVSPLW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.19%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.08%

6.96%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

12.97%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

12.30%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

12.30%

+3.19%