PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMODX vs. NTIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMODX vs. NTIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Opportunistic Income Fund (GMODX) and Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMODX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than NTIIX's -0.99% return.


GMODX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.07%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.36%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
4.24%

NTIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
3.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMODX vs. NTIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GMODX
GMO Opportunistic Income Fund
1.06%6.47%6.11%7.07%-2.09%0.27%
NTIIX
Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund
-0.99%2.16%-0.85%9.79%-6.51%-2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GMODX and NTIIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2021

0.53

The correlation between GMODX and NTIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMODX vs. NTIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMODX
GMODX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GMODX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMODX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMODX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GMODX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMODX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

NTIIX
NTIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NTIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NTIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMODX vs. NTIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Opportunistic Income Fund (GMODX) and Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMODXNTIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.20

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.30

1.18

+6.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.63

2.88

+27.75

GMODX vs. NTIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMODX Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the NTIIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMODX and NTIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMODXNTIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

0.99

+2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.02

+1.35

Drawdowns

GMODX vs. NTIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMODX drawdown since its inception was -8.79%, smaller than the maximum NTIIX drawdown of -12.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMODX and NTIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMODXNTIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.79%

-12.35%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.65%

-3.35%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.97%

-8.52%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-3.59%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-5.16%

+4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.16%

1.37%

-1.21%

Volatility

GMODX vs. NTIIX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Opportunistic Income Fund (GMODX) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund (NTIIX) at 0.16%. This indicates that GMODX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMODXNTIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.16%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.91%

2.51%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35%

4.00%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.82%

4.99%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.04%

4.99%

-1.95%

GMODX vs. NTIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMODX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than NTIIX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMODX vs. NTIIX - Dividend Comparison

GMODX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than NTIIX's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMODX
GMO Opportunistic Income Fund
5.01%4.99%5.28%6.17%5.44%2.10%4.15%5.69%4.35%2.66%2.55%1.71%
NTIIX
Navigator Tactical Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.28%4.07%4.24%3.85%1.63%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMODX and NTIIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMODX has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to NTIIX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMODX dropped -8.79% vs NTIIX's -12.35%.

GMODX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMODX and NTIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer