GMOC vs. TUSB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GMOC (GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF) and TUSB (Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

GMOC vs. TUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF (GMOC) and Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOC achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than TUSB's 1.93% return.

GMOC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TUSB

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 4.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOC vs. TUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMOC GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF	1.81%	0.70%
TUSB Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.93%	0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOC and TUSB is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

GMOC vs. TUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TUSB

TUSB Risk / Return Rank: 98
TUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
TUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
TUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 98
TUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
TUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOC vs. TUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF (GMOC) and Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMOC	TUSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	8.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.14	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	18.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	73.51	—

Drawdowns

GMOC vs. TUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOC drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum TUSB drawdown of -0.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOC and TUSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOC	TUSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.14%	-0.51%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.06%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-0.06%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMOC	TUSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50%	0.95%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.50%	1.25%	-0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.50%	1.25%	-0.75%

GMOC vs. TUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GMOC and TUSB have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GMOC vs. TUSB - Dividend Comparison

GMOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than TUSB's 4.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GMOC GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF	2.33%	0.84%
TUSB Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.26%	3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMOC and TUSB in my portfolio?

GMOC and TUSB have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GMOC or TUSB?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOC or TUSB?

GMOC and TUSB have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOC or TUSB?

TUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 2.33% for GMOC.

What is the main difference between GMOC and TUSB?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and Thrivent.