PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMMF vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMMF vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMMF vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GMMF
iShares Government Money Market ETF
0.84%3.70%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.62%-10.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMMF achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.62% return.


GMMF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
1.96%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-22.62%
6M
-40.89%
1Y
-17.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GMMF vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GMMF vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMMF
GMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMMF vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMMFIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

16.80

-0.40

+17.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

71.56

-0.29

+71.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

18.31

0.97

+17.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

132.15

-0.39

+132.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1,102.85

-0.83

+1,103.68

GMMF vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMMF Sharpe Ratio is 16.80, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMMF and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMMFIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80

-0.40

+17.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

16.12

0.35

+15.77

Correlation

The correlation between GMMF and IBIT is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GMMF vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

GMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

GMMF vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMMF and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMMFIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-49.36%

+49.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-49.36%

+49.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-46.11%

+46.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-14.13%

+14.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

23.09%

-23.09%

Volatility

GMMF vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF) is 0.05%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that GMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMMFIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

12.99%

-12.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

36.75%

-36.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24%

45.42%

-45.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.25%

51.26%

-51.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.25%

51.26%

-51.01%