PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMMA vs. TDSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMMA vs. TDSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMMA achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly lower than TDSC's 5.57% return.


GMMA

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
-1.27%
6M
0.10%
1Y
5.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDSC

1D
0.60%
1M
1.38%
YTD
5.57%
6M
7.79%
1Y
19.69%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMMA vs. TDSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GMMA
GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF
-1.27%8.95%0.49%
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
5.57%6.56%-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GMMA and TDSC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

0.61

The correlation between GMMA and TDSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMMA vs. TDSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMMA
GMMA Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TDSC
TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMMA vs. TDSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMMATDSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

2.18

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

3.10

-1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.98

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

15.39

-8.60

GMMA vs. TDSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the TDSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMMA and TDSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMMATDSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.18

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.32

+0.39

Drawdowns

GMMA vs. TDSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMMA drawdown since its inception was -5.21%, smaller than the maximum TDSC drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMMA and TDSC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMMATDSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-21.51%

+16.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-5.35%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-1.41%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-9.61%

+8.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.38%

-0.51%

Volatility

GMMA vs. TDSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) is 1.99%, while Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that GMMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMMATDSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

3.49%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

6.94%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

9.13%

-4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.20%

10.32%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.20%

10.28%

-3.08%

GMMA vs. TDSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMMA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSC's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMMA vs. TDSC - Dividend Comparison

GMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than TDSC's 2.12% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
GMMA
GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF
3.83%3.00%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
2.12%2.92%2.06%2.06%1.76%1.11%0.54%