GMMA vs. TDSC
GMMA (GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF) and TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — GMMA is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by GammaRoad Capital Partners, while TDSC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GMMA returned 5.89% vs 19.69% for TDSC. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMMA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TDSC.
Performance
GMMA vs. TDSC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMMA achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly lower than TDSC's 5.57% return.
GMMA
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSC
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- —
GMMA vs. TDSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | -1.27% | 8.95% | 0.49% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 5.57% | 6.56% | -1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMMA and TDSC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between GMMA and TDSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMMA vs. TDSC — Risk / Return Rank
GMMA
TDSC
GMMA vs. TDSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMMA | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 2.18 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 3.10 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 3.98 | -2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 15.39 | -8.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMMA | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 2.18 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.32 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
GMMA vs. TDSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMMA drawdown since its inception was -5.21%, smaller than the maximum TDSC drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMMA and TDSC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMMA | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -21.51% | +16.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | -5.35% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -1.41% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -9.61% | +8.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 1.38% | -0.51% |
Volatility
GMMA vs. TDSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) is 1.99%, while Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that GMMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMMA | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 3.49% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.82% | 6.94% | -3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97% | 9.13% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.20% | 10.32% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.20% | 10.28% | -3.08% |
GMMA vs. TDSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMMA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMMA vs. TDSC - Dividend Comparison
GMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than TDSC's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | 3.83% | 3.00% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 2.12% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 0.54% |