GMMA vs. SFTX
GMMA (GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF) and SFTX (Horizon International Managed Risk ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GMMA is passively managed, while SFTX is actively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GMMA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for SFTX.
Performance
GMMA vs. SFTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMMA achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than SFTX's 20.35% return.
GMMA
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.84%
SFTX
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.27K | $2.85K | $4.08K | |
| $27.26M | $12.93M | $8.17M |
GMMA vs. SFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | 5.54% | 0.30% |
SFTX Horizon International Managed Risk ETF | 20.35% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMMA and SFTX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMMA vs. SFTX — Risk / Return Rank
GMMA
SFTX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GMMA vs. SFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMMA | SFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMMA vs. SFTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMMA drawdown since its inception was -5.21%, smaller than the maximum SFTX drawdown of -12.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMMA and SFTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMMA | SFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -12.75% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.60% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.22% | -2.96% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | — | — |
Volatility
GMMA vs. SFTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMMA | SFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.55% | 22.43% | -15.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 22.43% | -14.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 22.43% | -14.99% |
GMMA vs. SFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMMA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SFTX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMMA vs. SFTX - Dividend Comparison
GMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than SFTX's 0.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | 3.38% | 3.00% | 0.57% |
SFTX Horizon International Managed Risk ETF | 0.21% | 0.25% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMMA and SFTX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMMA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMMA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for SFTX.
GMMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.21% for SFTX.
They also come from different issuers: GammaRoad and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GMMA and 0.82% for SFTX.
Find the right allocation for GMMA and SFTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer