PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMLGX vs. FEQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMLGX vs. FEQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMLGX achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than FEQHX's 10.01% return.


GMLGX

1D
0.26%
1M
3.34%
YTD
7.61%
6M
8.35%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.65%

FEQHX

1D
0.31%
1M
4.93%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.67%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMLGX vs. FEQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GMLGX
GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund
7.61%14.26%22.35%25.27%-3.08%
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
10.01%13.61%19.46%17.65%-4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GMLGX and FEQHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.95

The correlation between GMLGX and FEQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMLGX vs. FEQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMLGX
GMLGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GMLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GMLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQHX
FEQHX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FEQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMLGX vs. FEQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMLGXFEQHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

2.56

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.81

3.60

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.13

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.67

12.53

-1.86

GMLGX vs. FEQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FEQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMLGX and FEQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMLGXFEQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.56

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.32

-0.94

Drawdowns

GMLGX vs. FEQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMLGX drawdown since its inception was -56.56%, which is greater than FEQHX's maximum drawdown of -10.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMLGX and FEQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMLGXFEQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.56%

-10.42%

-46.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

-7.40%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.36%

-10.42%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-2.22%

-7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.85%

+0.39%

Volatility

GMLGX vs. FEQHX - Volatility Comparison

GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) at 2.67%. This indicates that GMLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMLGXFEQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

2.67%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

6.64%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

9.16%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

11.24%

+6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.67%

11.24%

+7.43%

GMLGX vs. FEQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMLGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQHX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMLGX vs. FEQHX - Dividend Comparison

GMLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.18%, more than FEQHX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
0.51%0.43%0.61%0.77%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GMLGX
GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund
17.18%18.49%4.20%0.75%10.27%3.03%0.38%1.01%2.22%4.25%2.99%3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GMLGX and FEQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GMLGX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to FEQHX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMLGX dropped -56.56% vs FEQHX's -10.42%.

FEQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMLGX and FEQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer