GMGZX vs. URFFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GMGZX (GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund) and URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, GMGZX returned 11.05%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for URFFX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. GMGZX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for URFFX.

Performance

GMGZX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGZX achieves a 10.14% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, GMGZX has outperformed URFFX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while URFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.12% annualized return.

GMGZX

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 10.14%
• 1Y: 20.97%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: 11.05%
• ALL TIME*: 8.62%

URFFX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 9.62%
• YTD: 13.05%
• 1Y: 24.29%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 10.12%
• ALL TIME*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GMGZX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund	10.14%	19.19%	15.12%	19.50%	-17.62%	17.15%	13.94%	24.93%	-8.09%	21.75%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	13.05%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	17.70%	10.52%	20.16%	-9.01%	19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGZX and URFFX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.97

The correlation between GMGZX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMGZX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMGZX

GMGZX Risk / Return Rank: 63
GMGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
GMGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GMGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
GMGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
GMGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 83
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMGZX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMGZX	URFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.91	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.69	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.35	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	2.87	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.08	12.30	-3.23

GMGZX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGZX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMGZX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGZX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGZX and URFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMGZX	URFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.63%	-44.25%	+14.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-7.89%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	-14.14%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-23.76%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.63%	-29.97%	+0.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-0.17%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.80%	-5.88%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	1.84%	+0.27%

Volatility

GMGZX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) at 2.93%. This indicates that GMGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMGZX	URFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.62%	2.93%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.50%	9.82%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	11.86%	+0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.54%	13.97%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.96%	14.33%	+0.63%

GMGZX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGZX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMGZX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

GMGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than URFFX's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund	3.48%	3.83%	4.44%	2.85%	5.99%	5.27%	2.10%	4.10%	7.97%	4.58%	4.01%	0.00%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.72%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMGZX and URFFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, GMGZX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GMGZX or URFFX?

GMGZX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to URFFX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGZX dropped -29.63% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.