GMGZX vs. FTLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GMGZX (GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund) and FTLSX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, GMGZX returned 9.83%/yr vs 3.53%/yr for FTLSX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMGZX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FTLSX.

Performance

GMGZX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGZX achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than FTLSX's 5.19% return.

GMGZX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 6M: 12.11%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 9.83%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

FTLSX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 6M: 5.44%
• 1Y: 12.01%
• 3Y*: 8.36%
• 5Y*: 3.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMGZX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund	11.37%	19.19%	15.12%	19.50%	-17.62%	17.15%	13.94%	24.93%	-8.09%	10.04%
FTLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund	5.19%	10.31%	4.72%	8.60%	-11.33%	3.30%	9.04%	10.97%	-1.40%	3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGZX and FTLSX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017	0.71

The correlation between GMGZX and FTLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (5 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GMGZX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMGZX

GMGZX Risk / Return Rank: 59
GMGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GMGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GMGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GMGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GMGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FTLSX

FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMGZX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMGZX	FTLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.67	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.98	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.55	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	3.32	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.88	14.65	-1.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMGZX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGZX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMGZX	FTLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.67	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.65	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.96	-0.36

Drawdowns

GMGZX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGZX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGZX and FTLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMGZX	FTLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.63%	-15.74%	-13.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-3.65%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	-4.83%	-10.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-15.74%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.85%	-2.81%	-3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	0.82%	+1.21%

Volatility

GMGZX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) at 1.79%. This indicates that GMGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMGZX	FTLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	1.79%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.21%	3.80%	+5.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.59%	4.54%	+7.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	5.43%	+8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.04%	4.78%	+10.26%

GMGZX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGZX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMGZX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

GMGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than FTLSX's 3.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FTLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund	3.53%	3.68%	3.37%	3.19%	5.28%	4.91%	3.06%	4.44%	4.26%	1.97%	0.00%
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund	3.44%	3.83%	4.44%	2.85%	5.99%	5.27%	2.10%	4.10%	7.97%	4.58%	4.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMGZX and FTLSX in my portfolio?

GMGZX and FTLSX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMGZX or FTLSX?

GMGZX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FTLSX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGZX dropped -29.63% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.