GMGZX vs. FHCDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GMGZX (GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund) and FHCDX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, GMGZX returned 9.83%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for FHCDX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GMGZX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FHCDX.

Performance

GMGZX vs. FHCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGZX achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than FHCDX's 14.02% return.

GMGZX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 6M: 12.11%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 9.83%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

FHCDX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 5.47%
• YTD: 14.02%
• 6M: 15.56%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 21.56%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMGZX vs. FHCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund	11.37%	19.19%	15.12%	19.50%	-17.62%	17.15%	13.94%	24.93%	-12.02%
FHCDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6	14.02%	22.85%	16.96%	20.69%	-18.85%	16.45%	18.05%	26.63%	-11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGZX and FHCDX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.97

The correlation between GMGZX and FHCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMGZX vs. FHCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMGZX

GMGZX Risk / Return Rank: 59
GMGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GMGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GMGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GMGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GMGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FHCDX

FHCDX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FHCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FHCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FHCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FHCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FHCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMGZX vs. FHCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMGZX	FHCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.50	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.44	-0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.46	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	3.29	-0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.88	14.62	-1.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMGZX vs. FHCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FHCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGZX and FHCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMGZX	FHCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.50	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.73	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.74	-0.13

Drawdowns

GMGZX vs. FHCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGZX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, smaller than the maximum FHCDX drawdown of -31.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGZX and FHCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMGZX	FHCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.63%	-31.28%	+1.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-9.68%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	-15.51%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-27.69%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.85%	-5.83%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	2.17%	-0.14%

Volatility

GMGZX vs. FHCDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) is 3.43%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that GMGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMGZX	FHCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	4.22%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.21%	10.46%	-1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.59%	12.73%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	15.12%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.04%	16.90%	-1.86%

GMGZX vs. FHCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGZX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FHCDX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMGZX vs. FHCDX - Dividend Comparison

GMGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than FHCDX's 3.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FHCDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6	3.31%	2.52%	5.51%	2.05%	5.98%	8.10%	4.24%	3.04%	3.50%	0.00%	0.00%
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund	3.44%	3.83%	4.44%	2.85%	5.99%	5.27%	2.10%	4.10%	7.97%	4.58%	4.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMGZX and FHCDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, GMGZX and FHCDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GMGZX or FHCDX?

FHCDX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to GMGZX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGZX dropped -29.63% vs FHCDX's -31.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.