PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMG.AX vs. AOO.F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GMG.AX vs. AOO.F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Goodman Group (GMG.AX) and Aedifica NV/SA (AOO.F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GMG.AX is traded in AUD, while AOO.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AOO.F values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMG.AX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than AOO.F's -1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GMG.AX has outperformed AOO.F with an annualized return of 18.06%, while AOO.F has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


GMG.AX

1D
0.44%
1M
6.01%
YTD
2.45%
6M
5.71%
1Y
-2.90%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
18.06%

AOO.F

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
-0.59%
1Y
3.65%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
-2.77%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMG.AX vs. AOO.F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMG.AX
Goodman Group
2.45%-12.27%41.44%47.71%-33.40%41.23%42.56%27.16%29.89%21.98%
AOO.F
Aedifica NV/SA
-1.32%33.44%-7.97%-5.23%-31.23%17.22%-7.14%58.96%13.53%23.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GMG.AX and AOO.F is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMG.AX vs. AOO.F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMG.AX
GMG.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GMG.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

AOO.F
AOO.F Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AOO.F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOO.F Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOO.F Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AOO.F Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOO.F Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMG.AX vs. AOO.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goodman Group (GMG.AX) and Aedifica NV/SA (AOO.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMG.AXAOO.FDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.11

0.17

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

0.40

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.05

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

0.28

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.20

0.58

-0.77

GMG.AX vs. AOO.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMG.AX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the AOO.F Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMG.AX and AOO.F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMG.AXAOO.FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

0.17

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

-0.10

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.28

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.22

-0.08

Drawdowns

GMG.AX vs. AOO.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMG.AX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than AOO.F's maximum drawdown of -55.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMG.AX and AOO.F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMG.AXAOO.FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.46%

-55.50%

-41.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.44%

-13.18%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.63%

-24.18%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.15%

-55.50%

+14.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.64%

-55.50%

+13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.08%

-29.69%

+12.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-20.03%

-25.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.68%

6.33%

+8.35%

Volatility

GMG.AX vs. AOO.F - Volatility Comparison

Goodman Group (GMG.AX) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to Aedifica NV/SA (AOO.F) at 7.57%. This indicates that GMG.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOO.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMG.AXAOO.FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.96%

7.57%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.36%

16.70%

+5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.07%

21.47%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.44%

26.25%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.72%

25.09%

+1.63%

Dividends

GMG.AX vs. AOO.F - Dividend Comparison

GMG.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than AOO.F's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOO.F
Aedifica NV/SA
5.96%5.83%3.38%5.76%4.82%1.82%4.01%5.07%6.70%2.81%2.95%6.91%
GMG.AX
Goodman Group
0.95%0.97%0.42%1.19%1.73%0.74%0.80%1.17%2.75%3.20%3.48%3.67%

Financials

GMG.AX vs. AOO.F - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goodman Group and Aedifica NV/SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GMG.AX values in AUD, AOO.F values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


GMG.AX and AOO.F have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMG.AX and AOO.F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer