PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMFZX vs. PDAHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMFZX vs. PDAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) and Prudential Day One Income Fund (PDAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMFZX achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than PDAHX's 5.13% return.


GMFZX

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.93%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.20%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
10.86%

PDAHX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.64%
YTD
5.13%
6M
5.18%
1Y
11.81%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMFZX vs. PDAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMFZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund
9.67%18.22%14.21%18.70%-17.40%16.30%13.82%24.26%-7.79%20.19%
PDAHX
Prudential Day One Income Fund
5.13%10.37%8.27%8.89%-11.69%9.21%8.22%13.58%-3.26%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GMFZX and PDAHX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.81

The correlation between GMFZX and PDAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMFZX vs. PDAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMFZX
GMFZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GMFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GMFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PDAHX
PDAHX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PDAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PDAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMFZX vs. PDAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) and Prudential Day One Income Fund (PDAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMFZXPDAHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.55

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.48

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

16.56

-4.42

GMFZX vs. PDAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMFZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the PDAHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMFZX and PDAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMFZXPDAHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.79

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.72

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.91

-0.54

Drawdowns

GMFZX vs. PDAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMFZX drawdown since its inception was -60.03%, which is greater than PDAHX's maximum drawdown of -15.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMFZX and PDAHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMFZXPDAHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.03%

-15.65%

-44.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-3.51%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.13%

-5.61%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-15.65%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.27%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-2.67%

-6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

0.73%

+1.18%

Volatility

GMFZX vs. PDAHX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Prudential Day One Income Fund (PDAHX) at 1.42%. This indicates that GMFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMFZXPDAHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

1.42%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

3.47%

+5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.86%

4.37%

+6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.53%

6.55%

+6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.41%

6.38%

+8.03%

GMFZX vs. PDAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMFZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PDAHX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMFZX vs. PDAHX - Dividend Comparison

GMFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than PDAHX's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMFZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund
4.11%4.50%5.87%3.27%6.81%5.46%2.36%3.33%7.99%4.37%3.97%19.91%
PDAHX
Prudential Day One Income Fund
4.61%4.92%7.35%3.54%7.78%7.72%2.22%4.25%3.70%1.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMFZX and PDAHX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMFZX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to PDAHX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMFZX dropped -60.03% vs PDAHX's -15.65%.

PDAHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMFZX and PDAHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer