GMFZX vs. GMTZX
GMFZX (GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund) and GMTZX (GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from GuideStone Funds. Over the past 10 years, GMFZX returned 10.98%/yr vs 5.93%/yr for GMTZX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GMFZX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for GMTZX.
Performance
GMFZX vs. GMTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMFZX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than GMTZX's 4.98% return. Over the past 10 years, GMFZX has outperformed GMTZX with an annualized return of 10.98%, while GMTZX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.93% annualized return.
GMFZX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
GMTZX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- 13.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.93%
GMFZX vs. GMTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMFZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund | 10.13% | 18.22% | 14.21% | 18.70% | -17.40% | 16.30% | 13.82% | 24.26% | -7.79% | 20.91% |
GMTZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund | 4.98% | 11.55% | 7.50% | 10.86% | -13.11% | 6.74% | 9.16% | 15.10% | -3.68% | 11.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMFZX and GMTZX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007 | 0.96 |
The correlation between GMFZX and GMTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMFZX vs. GMTZX — Risk / Return Rank
GMFZX
GMTZX
GMFZX vs. GMTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMFZX | GMTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 2.60 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 11.67 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMFZX vs. GMTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMFZX drawdown since its inception was -60.03%, which is greater than GMTZX's maximum drawdown of -43.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMFZX and GMTZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMFZX | GMTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.03% | -43.84% | -16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -4.95% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.13% | -6.32% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.61% | -17.76% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.18% | -17.83% | -12.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.09% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -4.89% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.10% | +0.85% |
Volatility
GMFZX vs. GMTZX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) at 2.58%. This indicates that GMFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMFZX | GMTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 2.58% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 5.16% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 6.10% | +5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 7.28% | +6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 7.33% | +7.12% |
GMFZX vs. GMTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMFZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GMTZX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMFZX vs. GMTZX - Dividend Comparison
GMFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than GMTZX's 5.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMFZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund | 4.09% | 4.50% | 5.87% | 3.27% | 6.81% | 5.46% | 2.36% | 3.33% | 7.99% | 4.37% | 3.97% | 19.91% |
GMTZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund | 5.39% | 5.66% | 6.34% | 3.77% | 7.27% | 5.35% | 3.64% | 4.01% | 6.38% | 2.62% | 1.45% | 15.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GMFZX and GMTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GMFZX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to GMTZX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMFZX dropped -60.03% vs GMTZX's -43.84%.
GMTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMFZX and GMTZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer