PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMFZX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMFZX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMFZX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 12.26% return.


GMFZX

1D
1.77%
1M
-0.14%
6M
6.38%
YTD
9.29%
1Y
19.43%
3Y*
15.07%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
10.51%
ALL TIME*
6.73%

FDFPX

1D
2.29%
1M
-0.99%
6M
8.37%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GMFZX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GMFZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund
9.29%18.22%14.21%18.70%-17.40%16.30%13.82%8.53%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
12.26%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between GMFZX and FDFPX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.96

The correlation between GMFZX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMFZX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMFZX
GMFZX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GMFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GMFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMFZX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMFZXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.40

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

10.04

-1.10

GMFZX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMFZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMFZX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMFZX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMFZX drawdown since its inception was -60.03%, which is greater than FDFPX's maximum drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMFZX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMFZXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.03%

-31.22%

-28.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-9.54%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.13%

-15.42%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-27.41%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-2.19%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-5.76%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.28%

-0.29%

Volatility

GMFZX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) is 3.37%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that GMFZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMFZXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

4.37%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

12.20%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

14.21%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

15.34%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

17.21%

-2.88%

GMFZX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMFZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMFZX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

GMFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than FDFPX's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.81%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GMFZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund
4.12%4.50%5.87%3.27%6.81%5.46%2.36%3.33%7.99%4.37%3.97%19.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GMFZX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDFPX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to GMFZX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMFZX dropped -60.03% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMFZX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer