PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMEY vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMEY vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF (GMEY) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMEY achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 7.73% return.


GMEY

1D
-1.50%
1M
-11.34%
YTD
1.59%
6M
-9.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
-3.03%
1M
1.48%
YTD
7.73%
6M
7.55%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMEY vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GMEY
YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF
1.59%-16.17%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
7.73%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GMEY and PEPS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMEY vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMEY

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMEY vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF (GMEY) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GMEY vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMEYPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

0.93

-1.60

Drawdowns

GMEY vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMEY drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEY and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMEYPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-21.26%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.34%

-3.15%

-20.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-2.77%

-13.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

Volatility

GMEY vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMEYPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.07%

13.43%

+15.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.07%

18.43%

+10.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.07%

18.43%

+10.64%

GMEY vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMEY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMEY vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

GMEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.28%, more than PEPS's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GMEY
YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF
52.28%21.84%0.00%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.91%1.00%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMEY and PEPS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GMEY.

GMEY has the higher dividend yield at 52.28%, compared with 0.91% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GMEY and 0.10% for PEPS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMEY and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer