PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMEU vs. XTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMEU vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMEU achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 11.13% return.


GMEU

1D
0.12%
1M
-18.73%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
-26.25%
1Y
-68.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTAP

1D
0.15%
1M
2.02%
YTD
11.13%
6M
12.15%
1Y
21.20%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMEU vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GMEU and XTAP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMEU vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMEU
GMEU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GMEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMEU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GMEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMEU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMEU vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMEUXTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

2.23

-1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

14.97

-15.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

79.56

-80.76

GMEU vs. XTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMEU Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the XTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMEU and XTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMEUXTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

4.55

-5.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

0.80

-1.50

Drawdowns

GMEU vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMEU drawdown since its inception was -80.43%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEU and XTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMEUXTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.43%

-22.13%

-58.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.75%

-1.42%

-71.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.91%

-0.06%

-77.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.24%

-3.45%

-59.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.19%

0.27%

+56.92%

Volatility

GMEU vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) has a higher volatility of 24.54% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.04%. This indicates that GMEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMEUXTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.54%

1.04%

+23.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.61%

3.16%

+54.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.15%

4.68%

+80.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.79%

14.54%

+75.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.79%

14.40%

+75.39%

GMEU vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMEU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMEU vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMEU nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GMEU and XTAP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMEU has higher volatility (24.54%) compared to XTAP (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMEU dropped -80.43% vs XTAP's -22.13%.

On 1-year performance, XTAP leads with 21.20% vs -68.74% for GMEU. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 21.20% return vs -68.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.

GMEU and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GMEU and 0.79% for XTAP.

XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMEU and XTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer