GMEU vs. XTAP
GMEU (T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GMEU returned -45.45% vs 18.69% for XTAP. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMEU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
GMEU vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMEU achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 11.99% return.
GMEU
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- 6M
- -16.41%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 1Y
- -45.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- —
GMEU vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMEU T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF | -7.00% | -65.67% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 11.99% | 15.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMEU and XTAP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMEU vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
GMEU
XTAP
GMEU vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMEU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 2.00 | -1.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 10.94 | -11.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 57.97 | -59.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMEU vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMEU drawdown since its inception was -80.76%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEU and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMEU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.76% | -22.13% | -58.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.94% | -1.72% | -57.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.39% | -0.25% | -79.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.49% | -3.39% | -61.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.08% | 0.32% | +38.76% |
Volatility
GMEU vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) has a higher volatility of 15.46% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.48%. This indicates that GMEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMEU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.46% | 1.48% | +13.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.87% | 3.83% | +52.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.98% | 4.77% | +66.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.79% | 14.55% | +72.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.79% | 14.28% | +72.51% |
GMEU vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMEU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMEU vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither GMEU nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GMEU and XTAP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMEU has higher volatility (15.46%) compared to XTAP (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMEU dropped -80.76% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 1-year performance, XTAP leads with 18.69% vs -45.45% for GMEU. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 18.69% return vs -45.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.
GMEU and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GMEU and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMEU and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer