GMEU vs. VRTL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GMEU (T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GMEU returned -68.74% vs 408.15% for VRTL. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.

Performance

GMEU vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMEU achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 213.68% return.

GMEU

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -18.73%
• YTD: -0.34%
• 6M: -26.25%
• 1Y: -68.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRTL

• 1D: -5.10%
• 1M: -13.08%
• YTD: 213.68%
• 6M: 137.88%
• 1Y: 408.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMEU vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMEU T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF	-0.34%	-65.56%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	213.68%	168.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GMEU and VRTL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

GMEU vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMEU

GMEU Risk / Return Rank: 2
GMEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GMEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GMEU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GMEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
GMEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 86
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMEU vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMEU	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	3.60	-4.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.12	3.38	-4.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.42	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	8.67	-9.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	22.06	-23.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMEU vs. VRTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMEU Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the VRTL Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMEU and VRTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMEU	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	3.60	-4.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.70	3.10	-3.79

Drawdowns

GMEU vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMEU drawdown since its inception was -80.43%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEU and VRTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMEU	VRTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.43%	-60.58%	-19.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.75%	-47.45%	-25.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.91%	-27.98%	-49.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.24%	-15.20%	-48.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	57.19%	18.62%	+38.57%

Volatility

GMEU vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) is 24.54%, while GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a volatility of 33.58%. This indicates that GMEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMEU	VRTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.54%	33.58%	-9.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.61%	87.68%	-30.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	85.15%	114.41%	-29.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.79%	124.31%	-34.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.79%	124.31%	-34.52%

GMEU vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GMEU and VRTL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

Dividends

GMEU vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMEU nor VRTL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMEU and VRTL in my portfolio?

GMEU and VRTL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMEU or VRTL?

VRTL has higher volatility (33.58%) compared to GMEU (24.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMEU dropped -80.43% vs VRTL's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, GMEU or VRTL?

On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 408.15% vs -68.74% for GMEU. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, GMEU has been the lower-risk option at 24.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GMEU or VRTL?

Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 408.15% return vs -68.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMEU or VRTL?

GMEU and VRTL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMEU or VRTL?

GMEU and VRTL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GMEU and VRTL?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.