GMEU vs. NTSD
GMEU (T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMEU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
GMEU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GMEU
- 1D
- -4.61%
- 1M
- -28.19%
- YTD
- -4.94%
- 6M
- -29.47%
- 1Y
- -69.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMEU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GMEU T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF | -21.29% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 14.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMEU and NTSD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMEU vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
GMEU
NTSD
GMEU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMEU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMEU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | 3.59 | -4.30 |
Drawdowns
GMEU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMEU drawdown since its inception was -80.43%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEU and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMEU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.43% | -5.20% | -75.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.93% | -3.72% | -75.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.30% | -0.88% | -62.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.36% | — | — |
Volatility
GMEU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMEU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.25% | 25.41% | +59.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.72% | 25.41% | +64.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.72% | 25.41% | +64.31% |
GMEU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMEU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMEU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither GMEU nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GMEU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.
GMEU and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GMEU and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for GMEU and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer