GMEU vs. CMGG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GMEU (T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF) and CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMEU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CMGG.

Performance

GMEU vs. CMGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMEU achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly higher than CMGG's -47.85% return.

GMEU

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -18.73%
• YTD: -0.34%
• 6M: -26.25%
• 1Y: -68.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMGG

• 1D: -4.79%
• 1M: -25.63%
• YTD: -47.85%
• 6M: -39.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMEU vs. CMGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GMEU T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF	-0.34%	-8.99%
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	-47.85%	43.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GMEU and CMGG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

GMEU vs. CMGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMEU

GMEU Risk / Return Rank: 2
GMEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GMEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GMEU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GMEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
GMEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMEU vs. CMGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMEU	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMEU	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.70	-0.62	-0.08

Drawdowns

GMEU vs. CMGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMEU drawdown since its inception was -80.43%, which is greater than CMGG's maximum drawdown of -56.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEU and CMGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMEU	CMGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.43%	-56.75%	-23.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.91%	-56.75%	-21.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.24%	-21.34%	-41.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	57.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMEU	CMGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	85.15%	66.82%	+18.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.79%	66.82%	+22.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.79%	66.82%	+22.97%

GMEU vs. CMGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMEU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMEU vs. CMGG - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMEU nor CMGG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMEU and CMGG in my portfolio?

GMEU and CMGG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GMEU or CMGG?

On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMEU or CMGG?

CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMEU or CMGG?

GMEU and CMGG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GMEU and CMGG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GMEU and 0.75% for CMGG.