PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMDYX vs. LCTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMDYX vs. LCTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMDYX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than LCTRX's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GMDYX has underperformed LCTRX with an annualized return of 1.84%, while LCTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.83% annualized return.


GMDYX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.84%

LCTRX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.24%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMDYX vs. LCTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMDYX
GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund
0.10%8.23%1.86%6.28%-14.96%-2.16%9.18%9.81%-0.39%4.11%
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
1.78%4.72%6.03%8.26%2.22%1.99%12.07%1.15%6.01%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GMDYX and LCTRX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2010

0.14

Over the past year, GMDYX and LCTRX have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMDYX vs. LCTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMDYX
GMDYX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GMDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GMDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

LCTRX
LCTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LCTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMDYX vs. LCTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMDYXLCTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.92

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.14

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

17.19

-11.06

GMDYX vs. LCTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMDYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the LCTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMDYX and LCTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMDYXLCTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.54

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

2.22

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.77

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.70

-0.54

Drawdowns

GMDYX vs. LCTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMDYX drawdown since its inception was -23.08%, smaller than the maximum LCTRX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMDYX and LCTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMDYXLCTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.08%

-26.09%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-1.17%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.60%

-1.33%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.30%

-3.82%

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.75%

-23.93%

+3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-0.09%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-4.12%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.28%

+0.69%

Volatility

GMDYX vs. LCTRX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) at 0.59%. This indicates that GMDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMDYXLCTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

0.59%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

1.42%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

1.91%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.95%

2.44%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.95%

6.31%

-1.36%

GMDYX vs. LCTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMDYX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than LCTRX's 2.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMDYX vs. LCTRX - Dividend Comparison

GMDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than LCTRX's 5.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMDYX
GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund
4.44%4.53%4.67%3.56%1.87%1.87%4.82%4.09%2.78%2.11%2.09%3.25%
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
5.28%5.53%5.57%5.31%2.18%1.69%1.17%2.40%3.31%2.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMDYX and LCTRX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMDYX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to LCTRX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMDYX dropped -23.08% vs LCTRX's -26.09%.

LCTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMDYX and LCTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer