GMCDX vs. SEDAX
Compare and contrast key facts about GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX).
GMCDX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Apr 18, 1994. SEDAX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Dec 4, 2005.
Performance
GMCDX vs. SEDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMCDX vs. SEDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCDX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund | 2.31% | 22.34% | 13.39% | 17.63% | -16.30% | 6.56% | 7.25% | 14.28% | -5.89% | 12.49% |
SEDAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund | -0.86% | 20.33% | 3.13% | 12.86% | -14.53% | -4.93% | 4.68% | 15.55% | -8.11% | 15.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMCDX achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than SEDAX's -0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, GMCDX has outperformed SEDAX with an annualized return of 7.62%, while SEDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.00% annualized return.
GMCDX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 20.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
SEDAX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 3.24%
- 1Y
- 14.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMCDX vs. SEDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMCDX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SEDAX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMCDX vs. SEDAX — Risk / Return Rank
GMCDX
SEDAX
GMCDX vs. SEDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMCDX | SEDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.12 | 2.76 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.54 | 3.86 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.59 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 2.80 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.85 | 12.58 | +5.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMCDX | SEDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12 | 2.76 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.48 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.39 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMCDX and SEDAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMCDX vs. SEDAX - Dividend Comparison
GMCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than SEDAX's 7.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCDX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund | 6.13% | 6.27% | 6.88% | 10.26% | 13.73% | 17.75% | 9.66% | 6.60% | 7.76% | 7.06% | 6.00% | 2.50% |
SEDAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund | 7.37% | 7.30% | 7.24% | 4.65% | 2.08% | 4.69% | 1.52% | 3.75% | 3.17% | 4.70% | 3.59% | 1.00% |
Drawdowns
GMCDX vs. SEDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMCDX drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than SEDAX's maximum drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMCDX and SEDAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMCDX | SEDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.24% | -37.03% | -31.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.69% | -5.49% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | -27.01% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.02% | -27.25% | +1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.56% | -4.97% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -6.83% | -10.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 1.22% | -0.08% |
Volatility
GMCDX vs. SEDAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX) is 2.27%, while SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that GMCDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMCDX | SEDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.27% | 2.95% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.92% | 3.99% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.72% | 5.60% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 6.91% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.31% | 8.42% | +0.89% |