GMAY vs. FFEB

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May) and FFEB (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February) are both exchange-traded funds - GMAY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while FFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GMAY returned 11.49%/yr vs 15.64%/yr for FFEB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

GMAY vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMAY achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly lower than FFEB's 6.71% return.

GMAY

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: 3.36%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 9.83%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFEB

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: 6.71%
• 6M: 6.41%
• 1Y: 16.51%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMAY vs. FFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May	3.36%	11.94%	12.12%	8.77%
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	6.71%	13.76%	16.64%	12.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GMAY and FFEB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2023	0.88

The correlation between GMAY and FFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMAY vs. FFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAY

GMAY Risk / Return Rank: 74
GMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FFEB

FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 81
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAY vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMAY	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.31	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.31	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.46	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	2.89	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.51	15.09	+1.43

GMAY vs. FFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMAY and FFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMAY vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAY drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -23.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAY and FFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMAY	FFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.75%	-23.14%	+11.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-5.73%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.75%	-11.89%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-1.17%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-2.41%	+1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	1.10%	-0.50%

Volatility

GMAY vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) at 2.25%. This indicates that GMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMAY	FFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	2.25%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.34%	5.89%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.16%	7.19%	-2.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.88%	10.83%	-2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.88%	13.71%	-5.83%

GMAY vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GMAY and FFEB have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

GMAY vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMAY nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMAY and FFEB in my portfolio?

GMAY and FFEB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMAY or FFEB?

GMAY has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to FFEB (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMAY dropped -11.75% vs FFEB's -23.14%.

Which ETF is better, GMAY or FFEB?

On 3-year performance, FFEB leads with 15.64% vs 11.49% for GMAY. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, FFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GMAY or FFEB?

Over the 3-year period, FFEB has performed better with a 15.64% return vs 11.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMAY or FFEB?

GMAY and FFEB have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMAY or FFEB?

GMAY and FFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GMAY and FFEB?

GMAY is categorized as Options Trading, while FFEB is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.