PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMAR vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMAR vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMAR vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
2.32%9.29%12.14%11.95%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.39%11.36%-2.18%-6.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMAR achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.39% return.


GMAR

1D
0.48%
1M
1.40%
YTD
2.32%
6M
4.36%
1Y
12.40%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
0.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GMAR vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GMAR vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAR
GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAR vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMARTLTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

0.75

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

1.05

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.14

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.28

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.96

3.35

+8.61

GMAR vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMAR and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMARTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.75

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

-0.03

+1.74

Correlation

The correlation between GMAR and TLTW is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GMAR vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

GMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.67%.


TTM2025202420232022
GMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.67%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Drawdowns

GMAR vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.11%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAR and TLTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMARTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-18.61%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-5.80%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.02%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

-8.49%

+7.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

2.21%

-1.16%

Volatility

GMAR vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) is 2.22%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that GMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMARTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

3.46%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

5.80%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

8.88%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.96%

11.55%

-4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

11.55%

-4.59%