GMAR vs. TAIL
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL).
GMAR and TAIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 16, 2023. TAIL is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Apr 5, 2017.
Performance
GMAR vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMAR vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 2.32% | 9.29% | 12.14% | 11.95% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 1.76% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMAR achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's 1.76% return.
GMAR
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 12.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- -4.58%
- 5Y*
- -6.94%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMAR vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMAR vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank
GMAR
TAIL
GMAR vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMAR | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 0.10 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 0.30 | +1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.05 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 0.11 | +1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.96 | 0.13 | +11.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMAR | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 0.10 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | -0.43 | +2.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMAR and TAIL is -0.53. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GMAR vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison
GMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.22% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% |
Drawdowns
GMAR vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.11%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAR and TAIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMAR | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -52.36% | +43.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.85% | -16.24% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -47.46% | +47.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -28.71% | +28.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 13.30% | -12.25% |
Volatility
GMAR vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) is 2.22%, while Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that GMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMAR | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 4.44% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 7.09% | -4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.50% | 17.83% | -9.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 14.90% | -7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 15.06% | -8.10% |