GLXU vs. TSLZ
GLXU (T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLXU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. GLXU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
GLXU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLXU achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than TSLZ's -5.69% return.
GLXU
- 1D
- -4.42%
- 1M
- -9.31%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 6M
- -34.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -5.69%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- 1Y
- -64.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLXU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLXU T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF | 3.25% | -54.75% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.69% | -57.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLXU and TSLZ is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLXU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
GLXU
TSLZ
GLXU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLXU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | -0.67 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
GLXU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLXU drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXU and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLXU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.66% | -99.11% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.07% | -99.01% | +21.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.08% | -75.36% | +18.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 60.60% | — |
Volatility
GLXU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLXU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 176.33% | 91.64% | +84.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 176.33% | 117.04% | +59.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 176.33% | 117.04% | +59.29% |
GLXU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLXU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLXU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
GLXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than TSLZ's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GLXU T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF | 7.23% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLXU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GLXU.
GLXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.23%, compared with 0.73% for TSLZ.
GLXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GLXU and 1.05% for TSLZ.
Find the right allocation for GLXU and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer