PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLWG vs. XTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLWG vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GLWG

1D
0.42%
1M
46.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTAP

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.32%
YTD
10.96%
6M
12.10%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLWG vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLWG and XTAP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLWG vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLWG

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLWG vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLWG vs. XTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLWGXTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.78

0.80

+7.98

Drawdowns

GLWG vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLWG drawdown since its inception was -29.53%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLWG and XTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLWGXTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.53%

-22.13%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.32%

-0.21%

-10.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-3.45%

-7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

Volatility

GLWG vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLWGXTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

151.06%

4.70%

+146.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

151.06%

14.54%

+136.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

151.06%

14.41%

+136.65%

GLWG vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLWG vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLWG nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GLWG and XTAP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTAP.

GLWG and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GLWG and 0.79% for XTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLWG and XTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer